Bitcoin’s eight-day stretch of consolidation looks to have weakened the prospects of a drop back to December lows near $3,100.
The leading cryptocurrency by market value has been restricted to a narrow range of $3,500 to $3,700 since Jan. 11.
That range play is somewhat surprising, as BTC had set the stage for a quick slide toward December lows near $3,100 with a 9 percent drop on Jan. 10 – the biggest single-day decline since Nov. 24. Notably, prices fell to $3,500 that day, erasing the hard-fought gains of the preceding two weeks.
Despite the sharp bearish reversal, a convincing break below the psychological support of $3,500 has remained elusive for eight days.
That could be considered a sign of sellers unwilling to offer the cryptocurrency so low in the bear market. Put simply, the probability of a drop to December lows has diminished, courtesy of the range bound activity.
As a result, range breakout and a re-test of $4,000 could be in the offing. As of writing, the cryptocurrency is changing hands at $3,620 on Bitstamp.
As seen above, BTC fell sharply on Jan. 10, confirming a bearish doji reversal. The relative strength index (RSI) also fell back into bearish territory below 50.00.
Still, the psychological support at $3,500 has held ground.
The descending triangle breakout on the hourly chart could be considered evidence of bear failure at $3,500 resulting in positive price action.
More importantly, the triangle breakout has opened the doors to $3,724 – the neckline of the inverse head-and-shoulders pattern.
A move above $3,724 would confirm a bearish-to-bullish trend change on the hourly chart and allow a stronger rally to $4,000 (target as per the measured move method).
- BTC’s range play likely represents bearish exhaustion.
- An inverse head-and-shoulders breakout, if confirmed, would open the doors to the psychological hurdle of $4,000.
- Acceptance below $3,500 would reinforce the primary bearish trend (downward sloping 10-week MA) and boost the probability of a drop to $3,122, although this scenario now looks less likely.
Disclosure: The author holds no cryptocurrency assets at the time of writing.